European economic governance: the Berlin-Washington Consensus
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Debating China ’ s Economic Growth : The Beijing Consensus or The Washington Consensus
Executive Overview This paper presents two competing views on China’s growth experience over the past three decades. For the sake of illustrative ease and brevity I label these two opposing views as the Beijing Consensus and the Washington Consensus. The Beijing Consensus interprets China’s economic growth as a function of innovations in the state sector, including close financial controls, sta...
متن کاملThe building of economic governance in the European Union
This article seeks to shed light on the development over the past decades of the concept of economic governance. It asks what is understood by economic governance and what role the social dimension has played. The article offers an analysis of the problems and possible issues confronting the EU as it seeks ways to address the sovereign debt crisis by embarking on deeper economic integration. Th...
متن کاملQuo vadis neoliberalism? The remaking of global capitalist governance after the Washington Consensus
The Washington Consensus, through which neoliberal global capitalist governance gained hegemony over the third world, entered a crisis in the late 1990s. Triggered by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, and by contestations of neoliberal governance from global civil society, two remakings of global capitalist governance can be identified: A ‘post-Washington consensus’ whose relation to neoliberali...
متن کاملDemocracy and the “ Washington Consensus ”
This paper argues that there is a substantial body of economic advice, roughly summarized in the “Washington consensus,” that deserves to be endorsed across the political spectrum. Such endorsement would still leave a series of major economic issues, most notably the tradeoff between efficiency and equity, to be determined by the outcome of the political process. It is argued that the “left,” i...
متن کاملIs the Washington Consensus Dead?
In the postwar years, most Third World countries turned inward partly in response to what they thought were the disastrous consequences of their 19th century integration into the world economy as the global economy collapsed in the Great Depression. The seeming success of Soviet central planning under Stalin also persuaded the leaders of these newly independent countries to substitute the plan ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Cambridge Journal of Economics
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0309-166X,1464-3545
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bet003